The scene of Jon Snow getting stabbed by his Night’s Watch brothers and
Olly shocked most fans of the show at the end of last season. All the book fans
knew of Jon’s impending fate but many show fans weren’t aware and were
completely blindsided by the death and loss of one of the show’s most beloved
and major characters. Having said that, his death was heavily foreshadowed by
the conversations Jon had with Ser Alliser Thorne and Olly’s slowly changing
behaviour towards Jon in the episodes leading up to the season 5 finale. If
you’re an avid fan of the story and a close follower of the show, you’d know
that the crew behind the hit HBO series often infuse their storytelling and
plots with a great deal of foreshadowing and creative camerawork.
Fast forward approximately 10 months and after the premiere of season 6
last week, Jon’s fate and his resurrection prospect remain unknown. He is
deader than ever as evidenced by his pale white skin and lifeless body in
episode 1. But all that doesn’t change the fact that there are still many
questions left unanswered about the snowy character. Who is Jon’s mother? Why
were there scenes where characters questioned the fact that Ned was Jon’s
father? Why did the show emphasised so much on the Night’s King’s fascination
with Jon and their intense stare-off at Hardhome if not to foreshadow a bigger
showdown to come between them? If there’s anything I’ve learned from the show
in the past 5 years, it’s that the series has very little filler scenes.
For most people who have followed the show closely, they will realise
that Jon’s resurrection is inevitable and his lineage will play a large role in
it. Ever since his death last season, most fans by now have become aware of the
possibility that Jon may be resurrected via Melisandre by the simple fact that
the Red Priestess was seen returning to Castle Black before Jon’s death, and
from the previous season’s knowledge that another devotee to the Lord of Light
in the form of the Red Priest Thoros of Myr having resurrected Ser Beric
Dondarrion 6 times. Adding those two pieces together, it makes a lot of sense
at first, that this will be how Jon will return. However, having recently
rewatched the entire 5 seasons in the past month, a new and unlikely theory has
dawned on me regarding Jon’s resurrection.
But before we get to that, let’s take a closer look at Jon’s supposed
lineage. We are almost certain that he is a Stark from Ned’s reassurance in
season 1.
During the
farewell scene at Winterfell before they separated, Jon and Ned spoke with each
other, for the very last time:
Ned: There’s great
honour serving in the Night’s Watch. The Starks have manned the Wall for
thousands of years. And you are a Stark. You might not have my name, but you
have my blood.
It is also needless to say that Jon looks a lot like Ned, Benjen, and
some of his siblings which will help his Stark claim. But the biggest mystery
of all remains: who is Jon’s mother and is Ned actually his father? Season 5
reinforced these questions even further when the pivotal scene that might
foreshadow the answer took place below:
As Stannis
Baratheon watches Jon training the brothers of the Night’s Watch at Castle
Black’s battlements below, his wife Selyse, fanatic servant of the Lord of
Light joins him, casting doubt on Ned’s infidelity under a new light:
Stannis: Lord
Commander of the Night’s Watch.
Selyse: A bastard
by some tavern slut.
Stannis: Perhaps,
but that wasn’t Ned Stark’s way.
So what was Ned Stark’s way? We all know from season 1 that Ned is loyal
and moral to a fault. Even when faced with imminent death during his
imprisonment, he was reluctant to falsely admit treason to save his daughters’
lives and his own. So if Ned did not dishonour Catelyn by having Jon as his
bastard son, that only leaves Brandon (Ned’s elder brother), Benjen and Lyanna
as possible parents to Jon. But the secrecy behind Jon’s lineage and Ned’s
sacrifice of his honour to protect that secret wouldn’t make much sense in the
story if Brandon and Benjen was Jon’s father. But that secrecy becomes
extremely important and would make the most sense and significance if Lyanna
Stark was indeed his mother.
From that, it becomes very plausible that Jon’s father was indeed
Rhaegar Targaryen who is the eldest son of the Mad King. Which was exactly the
reason for Ned’s secret. It has been brought up many times in the show that
Lyanna, who was promised to Robert Baratheon, was kidnapped by Rhaegar which
started Robert’s rebellion and eventually saw the overthrow of the Targaryen
dynasty in Westeros. But recent hints from season 5 have brought a new nuance
to that account. What if Lyanna was never kidnapped but chose to elope with
Rhaegar instead because they were both secretly in love? And if Jon is a
product of that doomed and tragic union, it would make sense why there was so
much secrecy surrounding his birth. This would explain why Ned knew he cannot
reveal Jon’s identity because Jon would be a Targaryen and we all know from
season 1 that Robert was hell-bent on killing all the Targaryens, even going so
far as to order the assassination of Daenerys when he learned of the existence
of her unborn child despite great misgivings from Ned.
This scene below from season 5 that took place between Littlefinger and
Sansa Stark in the crypts of Winterfell sealed the deal for me.
Littlefinger
approaches Sansa Stark who was standing in deep thought in front of the statue
of Lyanna Stark:
Littlefinger: How
many tens of thousands had to die because Rhaegar chose your aunt. [It
was a rhetorical question]
Sansa: Yes he
chose her, and then he kidnapped her and raped her.
A split second
after that, Littlefinger’s eyes immediately looked down with a smirk on his
left cheek, turned his head towards Sansa, cast his eyes down and smiled
knowingly. Throughout all that, he held his tongue.
It’s pretty obvious that Littlefinger knew more to that contrary to the
popular story but decided to keep it to himself then.
The next follows the true motive behind Ned’s decision to raise Jon as
his own and take his secret to the grave, literally. From the show, we know
that Rhaegar and Lyanna were killed during Robert’s rebellion. Rhaegar was
killed by Robert in single combat at the Battle of the Trident, a death that he
would forever relive in his dreams for his failure to keep Lyanna alive. But
Lyanna’s death was never fully discussed in the show. However, we now know that
that piece of vital information will be revealed this season from the trailer
in the form of the events from the Tower of Joy scene during the rebellion
which has until now, been only revealed in the books.
The Tower of Joy is where Ned went to rescue Lyanna towards the final
days of Robert’s rebellion. Upon his arrival, Ned and six of his most trusted
warriors found the Tower to be guarded by three Kingsguards. One of them being
Ser Arthur Dayne who is arguably the most legendary and chivalrous warrior of
the Seven Kingdoms to ever lived, and the other was a Lord Commander of the
Kingsguard. After the ensuing battle, of which everyone died except Ned and one
of his companion, Ned – according to texts from the books – found Lyanna in a
“bed of blood” making her an undisclosed promise before her death. It is very
likely that this was the promise to take Jon and raise him as his own bastard
and the bed of blood mentioned was in fact blood from her labour of her newborn
son. And this is exactly why Ned had to do what he did for Jon since a
Targaryen Jon will likely be hunted and killed by Robert.
This supposition is further supported by the fact that the Tower was
guarded by three of the seven members of the Kingsguard during the war. A
Kingsguard’s duty is to always be at the King’s side or guarding the crown. But
three was found guarding Lyanna at the Tower; one a legendary fighter and the
other a Lord Commander. Why would they be there and not at the Mad King’s side
or with the crown prince Rhaegar at the Trident unless there was more to it?
Maybe to protect the future heir of the Targaryens in case Rhaegar and Aerys
lost the war?
The show also continues to develop and build on Rhaegar and Lyanna’s
story well into season 5 last year. Why would the showrunners do this if not
for the fact that these stories are relevant? In fact, for the very first time
last season, the show shed a new light on Rhaegar’s supposedly antagonistic
character – a kidnapper, rapist and warmonger – when Ser Barristan Selmy
painted a new and likable light of him in his conversation with Daenerys.
Right before Ser
Barristan met his untimely and heroic death in the alleys of Meereen, he was
recounting his days of escorting Rhaegar outside the Red Keep into the streets
of King’s Landing disguised as a singer to walk among his people:
Ser Barristan:
Viserys never told you?
Daenerys: He told
me Rhaegar was very good at killing people.
Ser Barristan: Rhaegar
never liked killing. He loved singing.
So could it be that the truth is closer to the surface than we thought?
That maybe Rhaegar never did in fact kidnap and rape Lyanna out of lust and
greed, but that he and Lyanna eloped together and had Jon out of true love for
one another? Imagine this fact in the Game of Thrones for a second. If this was
true, what a game changer that would be.
Now that we know what Jon’s supposed lineage looks like, let’s go back
to the new unlikely theory of Jon’s resurrection. Because let’s face it, this
is Game of Thrones and if there’s anything we’ve all learned from 5 seasons so
far is that the obvious conclusion isn’t always the likelier one. So it does
not necessarily follow that because Thoros of Myr resurrected Ser Beric that
Melisandre will resurrect Jon at Castle Black. This is not taking into account
the fact that Ser Beric was freshly resurrected in all 6 deaths whereas Jon has
been dead for more than 24 hours at least if not more.
But one thing we can all agree on is that the hints toward Jon’s
resurrection have been there all along. Melisandre’s interest in Jon leading to
his resurrection is too obvious a choice but may actually hold a deeper, more
significant meaning related to his lineage than his resurrection. But that’s a
story for my next article. The alternative theory I’m proposing is probably
unlikelier but far more interesting and more significant. To explain my point,
we must go back to season 3 in the bath scene between Jamie Lannister and
Brienne of Tarth. The clues of Jon’s resurrection can be found in that
conversation:
Brienne listens
intently in silent shock to Jamie’s revealing monologue painstakingly
explaining the true story behind the reason why he slayed King Aerys Targaryen.
Had he not done so, all of King’s Landing would’ve burned in wildfire at Aerys’
command and thousands would have died.
Jamie: Then the
King turned to flee. I drove my sword into his back. “Burn them all!” he kept
saying. “Burn them all!” I don’t think he expected to die. He meant to burn
with the rest of us and rise again, reborn as a dragon, to turn his enemies
to ash.
And the clues for the reason for Jon’s resurrection can be found in the
conversation below between Melisandre and Ser Davos Seaworth when she first
learned of Jon’s death at Castle Black:
Melisandre enters
into a deep state of shock as she sees Jon’s lifeless body on a table. Each
step she takes towards the table feels like a step backwards in her faith for
the Lord of Light:
Melisandre: I saw
him in the flames, fighting at Winterfell.
Davos: I can’t
speak for the flames, but he’s gone.
So how does this all relate to Jon? If he’s a Targaryen, the possibility
of his rebirth in fire exists, much like how Daenerys was reborn when she
stepped into the burning pyre of Khal Drogo at the end of season 1. What
happens to all the dead at Castle Black? They burn them. So it’s very likely
that we will see Jon’s body placed on a pyre – along with his Valyrian sword
Longclaw – to be burned. When that happens, he will be resurrected in the fire
and be reborn. Thus, fulfilling Melisandre’s vision and making her realise that
he’s the warrior – Azor Ahai – that she’s been looking for all along, an
ancient warrior who would draw a burning sword from the fire called
Lightbringer to fight off the Darkness. In the books, Azor Ahai was prophesised
to be a descendant of the Targaryen bloodline.
Furthermore, we know from the season 6 trailer that there will be a huge
battle at Winterfell between the Wildlings and the Boltons. And then Melisandre
had a vision of Jon fighting at Winterfell. Suppose that does become true, why
would he be there? When Robb Stark went south to war, Jon kept his oath and
remained at Castle Black. When Ned, Robb and Catelyn were all murdered, Jon
remained loyal and continued his service at the Night’s Watch. So why? Because
if and when he does return, his death and rebirth will technically absolve him
from his oath to the Night’s Watch thus leaving him free to partake in the
battles between men south of Castle Black. I also doubt that he will continue
to remain fully loyal to the Night’s Watch after this considering their
betrayal and treachery.
I believe that this is a far likelier scenario that will explain Jon’s
true lineage and further his plot along with the events in the north. If
Melisandre were to resurrect him using the Lord of Light, there will be no
indication of his Targaryen roots and his return would be with a questionable
purpose.
In the final living days of Maester Aemon Targaryen, a pivotal
conversation took place between him, Samwell Tarly and Jon that foreshadowed
Jon’s imminent death, which we now know of, and his very likely return. But
more subtle was the hidden meaning of how the scene was shot that foretells a greater
tale of his supposed Targaryen lineage. And I want to stress here how this is
not the first time that the show has used creative camerawork to depict a scene
that tells a larger story that is far more interesting than the obvious. But
I’ll get to that at the end of this article:
Maester Aemon
listens intently and ruefully as Sam reads aloud the latest news of Daenerys’
exploits in Essos:
Aemon: And she’s
alone, under siege, no family to guide her or protect her. Her last relation
thousands of miles away, useless, dying.
Sam: Don’t say
that, Maester Aemon.
Aemon: A
Targaryen alone in the world is a terrible thing.
No sooner does
Aemon finishes that sentence than Jon walks into the chamber; the camera
focuses in on Jon immediately as he enters.
Jon comes in to
seek Aemon’s counsel on his decision to rescue the Wildlings and bring them
across the Wall. But he fears it will divide the Night’s Watch in a profound
way:
Aemon: Do it.
Jon: But you don’t
know what it is.
Aemon: That
doesn’t matter. You do. You will find little joy in your command. But with
luck, you will find the strength to do what needs to be done. Kill the boy, Jon
Snow. Winter is almost upon us. Kill the boy, and let the man be born.
In one sweeping conversation between two different characters, Aemon’s
words and the subtle camera shot not only hinted at Jon’s potential lineage and
presented the possibility that the Targaryen in the east is not necessarily
alone in the world, but he also foreshadowed Jon’s murder and his potential
rebirth into a new identity. A Targaryen perhaps?
So if Jon does indeed return, having seen what he’s seen, you’d expect
that his first priority is to deal with the imminent White Walker invasion. But
he hasn’t the men for such an undertaking, which will divert his attention to
the south for a while in the form of bringing the Wildlings or Freefolk under
his command by first taking back Winterfell as verified by the season 6 trailer
and Melisandre’s vision before setting himself up for the battle against the
supernatural threat from beyond the Wall.
But long before that ultimate showdown happens, I’d expect a third
Targaryen to be revealed in the form of Tyrion Lannister, who may actually be
the Mad King’s bastard son born to Joanna Lannister, Tywin Lannister’s deceased
wife, but that is a story for my next article. What’s with the Targaryens’
obsession with highborn noblewomen having names ending with Anna anyway? All I
will say for now is that in the books, Daenerys dreamed of a three-headed
dragon which could loosely be interpreted into three riders for her three
dragons, her being one of them. But her dream sequence from the show is a more
visually compelling argument for Daenerys, Jon and Tyrion to be our three
future dragon riders. To be further explained.
TL;DR (1): I’d expect to see Jon Snow to be back very soon. As if I
haven’t pointed out enough about the usage of foreshadows and subtle nuances in
this show, here’s another one:
Olly enters Sam’s
chambers bringing him food after he was badly beaten up by some brothers of the
Night’s Watch for protecting Gilly. What ensued was a conversation between them
on the nuances of Jon’s decision to bring the Wildlings back through the Wall.
Sam: Sometimes a
man has to make hard choices, choices that might look wrong to others, but you
know are right in the long run.
Olly: You believe
that?
Sam: With all my
heart. Try not to worry Olly. I’ve been worrying about Jon for years. He
always comes back.
What’s interesting about that conversation above is that Olly might have
taken some liberties to Sam’s advice on making the hard choices too literally.
In other words, Sam might have been responsible for why Olly decided to betray
Jon.
TL;DR (2): Now, remember what I said earlier about how creative
camerawork in the show may have been utilised much earlier in the show? If all
the above isn’t enough to convince you that Jon is a Targaryen, then let me
bring you back to episode 4 of season 1 where that conclusion may have already
been cast in stone by the show beyond any shadow of a doubt, or more literally
in this case, etched in wood. Depending on which media you watch your show on,
the scene is somewhere between the 38 and 43 minute mark. Once again, pay close
attention to the camerawork and how things lined up literally in this shot.
As Jon and Sam are
serving time scrubbing tables at the mess hall at Castle Black for
misbehaviour, they talked about Jon’s opportunity with a prostitute and why he
ultimately abstained because of his bastard last name and the fact that he
doesn’t know who his mother is. Then, Ser Alliser suddenly barges in on their
camaraderie. In that moment, Jon and Sam freeze and look at Ser Alliser. To the
left of Jon is a wooden beam. Etched on it are the very clear letters of
R and L, with Jon standing at the right end of these two letters.
If I have to be any more obvious than that, it’s Rhaegar + Lyanna = Jon.
Have
fun rewatching!
1 comment:
yes
I think so
Post a Comment